Dr. John Patterson testified in his own defense Tuesday. Dylan Lovan/AP
Taking the stand in his own defense, Patterson testified Tuesday there was no indication before surgery that Seaton had penile cancer. He argued that he acted out of medical necessity in the man's best interest.
The doctor said that when he removed Seaton's foreskin he found a diseased organ that could not be recognized as a penis, The Associated Press reported.
Following the surgery, the rest of Seaton's penis was amputated by a different doctor, Patterson's lawyer argued.
Two physicians who testified at the civil trial Tuesday differed on whether the partial amputation was a medical necessity that needed to be performed immediately, as Patterson has claimed, The Associated Press reported.
Family members also testified that Seaton has become extremely angry since the surgery.
With News Wire services.
8/24/2011
Man suing doc for amputating penis signed pre-operation consent form but can't read: lawyer
Brian Bohannon/AP
Deborah and Phillip Seaton of Waddy, Ky., are suing Phillip Seaton's urologist for amputating his penis during what was supposed to be a circumcision.
Related Posts:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment